Monthly Archives: April 2014

How necessary is penmanship in the world and math profession?

As a math major, I depend on numbers, formulas, and measurements to perform my duties. As a college student I depend on computers and phones to e-mail projects, send messages, and even create this blog to have discussions with others on important topics. One day when I asked my friend in school to write down some notes on the news, I saw his handwriting and I couldn’t recognize a single word he wrote down. When I questioned his writing skills he told me, “I am a computer science major and thus I do not have to know how to write things down on a piece of paper.” The question of whether this was his opinion or some kind of thinking brought up by this profession is one of the major topics I’m trying to find out hear along with our forgotten ways.
After hearing that, I was shocked at the seemingly stupid remark and so I have to see this issue from his point of view. We live in a digital age when so much is done with computers and other technological innovations. In fact, some professionals say that we have ascended into the age of technology given our extensive use of electronics. You can ask anyone what an iPod or Tablet is without any problem, but if you show them an abacus or a slide rule they’ll give you a weird look and have no idea what those things are. Even common things like compasses can be found on a device in seconds while knowledge of the physical tools is slowly dying out. There was even a point where we used calculators and GPS’s so much that we can’t actually function without them. This leads to terrible consequences if we have an energy crisis or lose power in our electrical devices without being able to charge them for a long period of time.
Due to my intended profession, I have to see if other people in the mathematics field succumb to this kind of thinking. Before high school I was raised to avoid using calculators to use math problems because my family believed I would become far too dependent on it. By the time I was in high school I was required to use a calculator in my studies and ever since then, I (and I’m guessing many other people) find it harder to do certain math problems without the use of a calculator. But then when I went to college I discovered that there are websites and computer tools I can use for the more complex problems. Websites like www.wolframalpha.com allow people to type in a particular formula that could be too difficult or too long for people to find for themselves, which is qualitatively better. There is also the use of Microsoft excel, which allows me to use special formulas multiple times using each cell as the units, which is quantitatively better. It’s great to have these innovations for my profession, and yet I still feel like there are many people who are losing thier touch with certain basic math skills.
It’s important to know the difference between math and writing. As a math major, I deal with a lot of numbers and formulas which require special symbols and patterns. This is very different from writing because while someone rights words from left to right or some other pattern, math formulas can go left to right and top to bottom at the same time. This means that a paragraph can fill up 6 horizontal lines on top while a math problem takes up an entire quadrant of a page (imagine you fold a piece of paper horizontally and vertically and then you fill up one of those rectangles created). Another important difference is that writing paragraphs is just putting together words to make sentences and using those sentences to make a paragraph, while a math problem will involve taking pre-made formulas and plugging in numbers (like raw materials placed in a machine in a factory) in order to create a new answer. The point I’m trying to make here is that writing a story is just like taking puzzle pieces and making a work of art, while mathematics is like using the same templates over and over again to make a limitless number of solutions to help solve real world problems.
This not to say technology is bad for writers or that writing isn’t important to humanity and mathematicians. Without writing we wouldn’t have lectures, historical documents, scientific reports, amazing stories, and many more things. I’m just trying to point out that we have to remember the old ways of writing to protect ourselves from unexpected situations, and that my experience as a mathematician can change how I view the importance of writing and penmanship. How do you feel about writing given your particular profession?

When is it a competition?

The very idea of a competition can be seen all around us. There are competitions when playing games, running for elections, searching for a job, and many more instances. Also, within those instances are several variations of the task these people are trying to reach. This includes running for class president or class treasurer, playing video games or outdoor activities, trying to get a full-time position or internship, and many more examples. But what exactly is a competition and is there a common definition that everyone agrees on?

To solve this problem, it’s important to first understand the textbook definition of a competition. Here are a few examples I found in several different textbooks and dictionaries:

  • The effort to obtain something wanted by others; rivalry
  • A contest for some prize, honor, or advantage
  • Rivalry for supremacy, a prize
  • (Biology) The struggle among organisms, both of the same and of different species for food, space and other survival requirements
  • (Sociology) Rivalry between 2 or more persons or groups for an object desired in common, usually resulting in a victor and a loser but not necessarily involving the destruction of the latter

From these definitions, we can establish some key repeating points. Namely, a competition must involve at least 2 different parties made up of either an individual or a group, and there should be some kind of outcome that features a reward. The issue now is whether or not this applies to everyone’s personal definition. For instance, many people say they are competing with themselves in order to beat a previous record or high score in a game. Although it is a contest with a reward, there is still only one person involved and thus can’t really be defined as a competition. Another example would be when a gym teacher sets up teams in a competition and the final result is that everyone had fun. It’s true that everyone is facing each other and having fun, but if no winner is declared then there can’t be a reward, physical or abstract. Some would even say not giving recognition to the winning team is insulting, but that is more for the individual to decide.

Then there are times when a competition seems to one sided and then the definition seems flawed. A great example would be if two people were competing for a full time job. Person A would have a Masters Degree, be dressed well, have an excellent resume, and may even have nepotism within the firm. Person B would be dressed sloppily, have never prepared for an interview before, and may just have a high school degree and nothing beyond that. Now according to the definition there are two separate parties competing and there is the reward of receiving the position. However, the one with the degree and such will obviously be the victor and it seems rather pointless for the other guy. I’m not saying he shouldn’t at least try, but can it be called a competition if the winner can be found before the task is complete? The