International Labor Schemes

By Rex Alex

Changing gender attitudes through seasonal work

The labor schemes promoted by Australia and New Zealand offer a solution to the conflicts faced by Environmental Refugees. For example, New Zealand and Australia have opened seasonal workers programs for Pacific Islanders. Australia has also opened nursing programs through the Kiribati Australia Nursing Initiative and invested in the Kiribati Institute of Technology in which students will be educated with Australian standards. Such programs offer the chance for eventual permanent settlement  and social mobility for Pacific Islanders. While such opportunities can be helpful, they also come with the risk of labor exploitation, particularly for seasonal fruit picking workers. Another concern with these programs is how they are operated exclusively within the standards of the country which funds them. This can cause the  Pacific Island nations to lose sovereignty and the Indigenous people of these islands may lose their culture and knowledge regarding the land. Furthermore these programs are critiqued for disproportionately benefiting young, educated and upper-class Kiribati, who are only a small percentage.  

 

Klepp, Silja, and Johannes Herbeck. “The Politics of Environmental Migration and Climate Justice in the Pacific Region.” Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, vol. 7, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 54–73, 10.4337/jhre.2016.01.03. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Silja-Klepp-2/publication/299575803_The_politics_of_environmental_migration_and_climate_justice_in_the_Pacific_region/links/5852859708aef7d030a4eaa9/The-politics-of-environmental-migration-and-climate-justice-in-the-Pacific-region.pdf  

Migration With Dignity

By Rex Alex

He leads the country that could drown | Fortune

There are several innovative policy solutions which are being implemented in hopes to remediate current climate conflicts and avoid future complications, however such policies are not without unique shortcomings. One such policy is the “Migration with Dignity” initiative which was implemented by Kiribati President Anote Tong. As a nation of small islands and atolls, Kiribati has no sustainable internal migration solution; thus the goal is to develop large expatriate communities in Australia, New Zealand and other developed nations which comes with the additional benefit of remittances for Kiribati. Furthermore, the core policy is to “upskill” Kiribati citizens through government programs which provide education or job training so that they can migrate to new countries not as victims but as qualified workers. While the intent of this policy is noble, it fails to reach those with limited literacy and subsistence livelihoods. Also, Many people view the ‘migrate with dignity’ strategy critically, as it reinforces the image of Kiribati as a ‘climate change poster child’ and symbolic “sinking island state”, such stereotypes are rejected by Kiribati citizens.  

McNamara, Karen. “Cross-Border Migration with Dignity in Kiribati.” Researchgate.net, May 2015,  https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/climatechange-disasters/mcnamara.pdf  

The Root Causes of Climate Migration

By Rex Alex

Climate Adaptation and Resilience Costs in the Pacific Islands and Atolls - Climate Adaptation Platform

There are a plethora of motivations behind why someone may decide to become an Environmental Refugee. These include push factors, for example, climate change can cause a reduction in land, livelihood or habitat security for some Pacific communities. Similarly, low-lying coastal areas and river deltas may become unsuitable for physical settlement, or they remain habitable but income and food security options become marginal. As well as reduced precipitation or increased disease vectors causing the deterioration of habitability. However there are also some pull factors including, labor market opportunities that come with better education, health care or the ability to send remittances to families. In regards to community relocation, communities may prefer to relocate to sites that are as close to the original settlement. This would enable communities to sustain most of their livelihoods, although those based on the coastal sector may become less viable. Evaluating these push and pull factors allows for better understanding of the conflicts Environmental Refugees face.

ampbell, John, and Olivia Warrick. Climate Change and Migration Issues in the Pacific CLIMATE CHANGE and MIGRATION ISSUES in the PACIFIC. Aug. 2014. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/migpractice/docs/261/Pacific.pdf

What is an Environmental Refugee and Why are they Important?

By Rex Alex

Taking a Look at Poverty in Nauru

Environmental refugees face similar experiences as other refugees however they are held to different standards. The first step in evaluating these differences is to accurately define an Environmental Refugee. The best definition is presented by the International Organization for Migration which states that an Environmental Refugee is, “persons or groups of persons who, for compelling reasons of sudden or progressive change in the environment that adversely affect their lives or living conditions, are obliged to leave their conditional homes, or choose to do so, either temporarily or permanently, and who move either within their country or abroad.” 

Although this definition is accurate it is not sufficient under international law for the principle of non-refoulement, which prevents refugees from being sent back to a country where they face danger, to be extended to Environmental Refugees. This privilege is denied for Environmental Refugees as per the 1951 refugee convention from the UNHCR which effectively limits this protection to refugees facing dangers from a government or organization based on their identity.  

“The Problem.” Climate Refugees, www.climate-refugees.org/why#:~:text=The%201951%20Refugee%20Convention%20offers. Accessed 9 May 2022.