Monthly Archives: March 2018

cover letter

  1. March 27, 2018

    Re: Chief Compliance Officer

    To whom this may concern

    Im writing to express my interest in the Chief Compliance Officer position available at the Family Service League . I currently have a Double master’s degree in Law and Business Management from Harvard University. I’m interested in managing health care professionals to help ensure a safe climate for all patients while protecting the company from legal infractions . In doing this i hope to build stable relationship between consumer and provider. My experience in college built my ability to not only connect well with other people but communicate at a high levels.

    My 5 Years at Harvard studying law I’ve learned the ins and outs of the Judicial system. Not to mention the internships I’ve a received at prestigious companies furthering my knowledge of the courtroom. I’ve learned how to gather evidence, think critically , and build a people skills.While I studied law for the last 5 years, I began to understand the point behind specific laws that seems more harmful then beneficial. My business background led me to understand the needs of my peers in a respective area. With that being said I understand the people around me.

  2.  

    I am excited to work with a department who puts family first . I believe my abilities and high education have properly prepared me for working with a respectable department.

What Holds America Together

David Brooks , an editor for the meritorious “New York times” Newspaper, shares his idea of what keep Americans together. He uses a scientific approach to encourage the reader to listen to a scientist rather than a journalist. Brooks states ” Despite our differences, we devote our lives to the same experiment, the American experiment to draw people from around the world and to create the best society ever, to serve as a model for all humankind”. He gives himself higher credibility by treating his observations and ideas more like an experiment. Instead of listening to a journalist from new york you’re reading and articulating a scientist from harvard. He talks about walt witmans, essay specifying that democracy teaches how to become “high class men”. Brooks talks bout whitmans philosophy on his post-civil war beliefs. He thought with all of the cons of the civil war there would be unity but instead the opposite happen. A Large part of that he explained, is class systems in Europe denied unity and that america would fall back to European lifestyle. Nonetheless, The author believes unity is an experiment that all people subliminally follow and want to take part in by doing that creates a bond that all people share and that hold america together. All the different people trying to live amongst each other.

Is torture a complete violation of human rights?

Describe your topic and state which side you will argue in your paper. Why did you choose this topic? Why do you think it’s important to discuss? Look into some background information about your topic and include some of it here. Think about what might important for the reader to know about your topic before they delve into your paper.

My topic is on torture on civilians in order to coerce them to give a confession or give up information. I choose to the side of ending it because of the affects it has on more than just the tortured. I chose this topic because I have family members in the army and I’ve heard stories of things thats happen to their comrades. Also I believe it’s important to discuss because torturers come from many places and sometimes they come from the government. and if the government can torture people it can torture you. For example Human experimentation on human in the soviet union and north korea. I feel like the reader should know that this is a serious problem and a big deal and how it could affect them and be a big problem in the future especially with tensions between nations rising . Maybe even a little bit of history would be useful for the topic

What claims are you ultimately going to make about your stance? What reasons will you give to back those claims? What kind of evidence will you use?

I plan to make claims on the perspective of the tortured and torturer and how it affects them. Then ill zoom out and look at how it affects nations , the view of nations and the people of the nation and explain how it has a negative impact on the people and the trust of the people in the nation.

What counterarguments could you anticipate about your stance?

A counter argument for not being able to torture someone is the exact reason its used for. “If we don’t use force and torturing methods, how will we find crucial information that wont be found out otherwise”.The answer to that is : there is another way and there is an answer. Torturing isn’t only used for on humans though . Humans abuse animals psychologically and Physically. And it’s justified usually because the person is trying to obtain dominance/ obedience over the animal. Which goes without say, isn’t really a good justification.