The idea of “no man left behind” sounds appealing and reasonable. However, it can cause some major setbacks that could be avoided if it is decided that a man could be left behind. It is understandable that a unit would want to move forward together to reach their final destination. But the movie, “Black Hawk Down,” shows how it could lead to an unfavorable outcome.
It was’t unusual to see many American soldiers injured, with their legs blown off or no hands. In a scene that specifically stuck out to me, two soldiers were in the front seat of a vehicle, and about ten to fifteen injured/dead soldiers in the back. The soldier who was driving got shot in the face and couldn’t see a thing. But the man who was in the front seat with him insisted he keep his foot on the gas. How can a man who had just been shot in the face, unable to see, and in what I imagine, unbearable pain, still drive a vehicle? Instead of moving him over or leaving him, he was expected to still take on the responsibility of driving the other injured soldiers to medics.
There were many scenes of soldiers putting their lives on the line in order to help the other men. I admit that it is an incredibly heroic act, and they should be praised for their courage. However, it also could lead to their own deaths, so is it really worth it?
Black Hawk Down. Dir. Ridley Scott. Perf. Josh Hartnett, Eric Bana, Tom Sizemore. Sony Pictures, 2001. Film.