Osho

The idea that love is intelligence may be simplified to iq=eq.

Suggesting meditation is good; meditation is known to be good.

The improbable may be better than Osho thinks.

Detachment is a trade off.

Teaching is a tradeoff.

Not all primitive people appear as great as Osho says.

People do seem out of balance.

The theory of the book that we should live more now has benefits.

I am interested in the empirical outcomes of employing this book.

Bring intelligence into everything that you do.

The outcomes of this book are waco-like.

Reading this book requires constant use of the principle of charity.

It may be that Osho lacks classical intelligence, and that this has caused him to create a classically unintelligent definition of intelligence; a book redefining intelligence may have been more well received if the author possessed the original definition of intelligence; transcending what you don’t have is odd.

The unintelligent person respects others.

The questioning attitude is the basis of all intelligence.

The idiot is inside you and so is the genius. Of course, the idiot is much more powerful because it has a longer history, and the genius is a very still, small voice.

Given evolutionary non-ergodicity Komeini may not have had any Einstein at all.

A single person can destroy your 200,000,000.

There is no need for any commitment.

They should know science as much, as deeply, as they should know meditation.

The unintelligent person respects Osho. Osho may have something to teach us. It may require work to extract utility from Osho. It may be trouble if you extract falseness from Osho.