Tag Archives: instructional design

Summer 2023 Online Teaching Course

By Carol Hernandez, Ed.D.
Senior Instructional Designer
CELT
carol.hernandez@stonybrook.edu

The Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching offers the Online Teaching Course (OTC) multiple times a year with two options: OTC and  OTC Accelerated. These multi-week online courses will provide you with basic pedagogical, research-based practices specific to the online space and will assist you in planning instructional activities for your course. We will not focus on how to use Brightspace, but rather how to best use technology to meet your pedagogical goals. These courses will be delivered asynchronously online with one optional synchronous session.

  • OTC: This is a 5-week asynchronous course. Plan on spending 3-4 hours per week with assignments due weekly. We suggested logging on 4 times aweek during this course. 
  • OTC Accelerated: This is a condensed, 2.5- week version of the OTC. Plan on spending 6-7 hours weekly with assignments due every 2-3 days. We suggest logging in daily during the course. 
Decorative
Take the OTC this summer and work with our team of instructional designers.

OTC: 2.5 week or 5 week in Brightspace

Registration link: https://forms.gle/XDAfydMiDQ4xt4ms7

Summer Dates:

  • (5-week) Monday, May 22 to Monday, June 26, 2023
  • (2.5-weeks) Wednesday, July 12 to Friday, July 28, 2023

If you are an instructor who has already taken the OTC fairly recently, and you need assistance in Brightspace, you can request a one-on-one consultation by filling out this form: https://forms.gle/Wn2qY4CrwyocW61J9

If you are an instructor new to teaching online, take the OTC and after that, start meeting with an instructional designer.

If you are an instructor who is only revising a course, you can request a one-on-one instructional design consultation by emailing: CELT@stonybrook.edu.

Got questions? Email us: CELT@stonybrook.edu.

Congratulations to Jennifer Carter!

Carol Hernandez Carol Hernandez, Senior Instructional Designer

Jennifer CarterJennifer Carter, Ph.D., a lecturer teaching in the Department of Philosophy and the College of Business, is one of six SBU adjunct faculty members selected for the Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Adjunct Teaching given by the State University of New York (SUNY). The awards are conferred to acknowledge and provide system-wide recognition for superior professional achievement and to encourage the ongoing pursuit of continuous academic excellence. The Excellence in Adjunct Teaching is a new award category, which recognizes consistently superior teaching at the graduate, undergraduate or professional level.

During the past year, Carter has worked closely with the instructional design team in the Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) to redesign and build a completely asynchronous online course, PHI 108: Logical and Critical Reasoning. The philosophy course has the largest enrollment for any course in that department, with about 550 students per semester. With the help of CELT’s instructional designers, Carter transformed the course from a face-to-face model to a completely online and asynchronous model where students move through as a cohort, but with weekly online assignments where they engage with each other, the instructor, and the course content. Carter has taught the redesigned course twice so far and student feedback is positive, she said. Students have commented on the high level of interactivity and real-time engagement with the instructor and their peers, all despite connecting in a virtual classroom. While the course tends to be taken mostly by freshmen and sophomores, it can be useful for upperclassmen as well because it supports critical thinking and lifelong learning. The course addresses the Stony Brook Curriculum as both an ESI: Evaluate and Synthesize Researched Information, and an HUM: Address Problems Using Critical Analysis and the Methods of the Humanities.

Working with CELT, she said, was a high point in her teaching journey. “There were times during the pandemic when I was discouraged and working with CELT was really great.”

Carter, who is originally from California, earned both her doctorate and master’s degrees at Stony Brook University. She has been teaching for about a decade. Carter typically has 2-4 undergraduate teaching assistants in the redesigned philosophy course, which is critical for a course that provides a high level of interaction for students. A best practice for online course design and facilitation is to create a sense of “presence” by establishing community and interdependence. However, that also requires real-time human facilitation by the instructor and teaching assistants. In addition to philosophy courses, Carter also teaches BUS 447: Business Ethics, first-year seminars, and a spring special topics course for undergraduates. 

As an educator, Carter is passionate about developing and mentoring both undergraduate and graduate teaching assistants. Each year, Carter mentors 4 to 6 Ph.D. Philosophy students and 3 to 8 undergraduate teaching assistants. With the doctoral students, she instructs them on course development, lecturing, grading, and “how to arrange the course and information so that it is digestible for students and keeps their interest,” she said. For undergraduates, Carter provides overall mentoring and leadership guidance, while also facilitating reading groups, guiding the teaching assistants, advising students on graduate school applications, and directing the honors theses.

Carter was nominated for the Chancellor’s Award by her department colleagues. “It made me feel really special,” she said. “I think there were a few important factors that made me stand out. Innovation was one element. I think developing the new course and the new curricula – especially those that address the future of SBU students. 

“The course that I developed with CELT addresses not just the needs of students on campus today but also the needs of the students coming to the campus in the future. In the sense that it accommodates the widest variety of students: students with disabilities, students in different disciplines, and with different backgrounds . . .  but it’s still rigorous and it still piques students’ interest.”

Carter said she is proud of the award because it highlights her dedication to teaching. She says she has put a lot of effort into developing future educators from a variety of disciplines: medicine, economics, finance, psychology, sociology. “It is absolutely what I thrive on and it really gives me a lot of satisfaction to help others to have the skills to create their own learning as a way of life.”

In addition to serving the SBU community as an educator and mentor, Carter was elected in 2021 to serve as the secretary for the Stony Brook Center Campus Chapter of the United University Professions (UUP). The UUP represents academic faculty, students affairs personnel, librarians and others who work on campus. The chapter Carter is involved in has more than 2,300 members.

For Carter, teaching and learning is not just her profession, but a way of life. Carter is also a parent, and delivered four of her children at Stony Brook University Hospital. Imagine her surprise when the pediatric resident came in to examine one of her newborns and it turned out to be one of her former SBU students. “We were just so happy. We had talked a lot during the class, so we fell right back into our usual pattern. It was really sweet.”

The six adjunct professors at Stony Brook University who won the Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Adjunct Teaching given by the State University of New York (SUNY) are:

  • Jennifer Lyons Carter, Department of Philosophy
  • Michele Giua, Department of European Languages
  • Leslie Marino, Department of European Languages
  • Patricia Maurides, Department of Art
  • Jessica Mitchell, School of Social Welfare
  • Joanne Souza, Department of Biology

 

Online Teaching Certificate (OTC) Course: Summer 2022

Happy Summer! Join the Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) for one of our Online Teaching Certificate (OTC) multi-week courses:

Please register in advance.

springtime with flowers
Larisa Koshkina, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Overcoming Challenges Associated With Group Work

Kimberly Bell Kimberly Bell, Teaching Assistant Development Specialist

Ok, you are taking a stab at this whole group work thing. You planned a multi-week activity that you think your students will find relevant and (not too) challenging. Then, you took Jennifer’s awesome advice, created a group contract with roles, and planned for group reflection after the activity. Your students diligently completed their contracts, chose their roles, and agreed to work cooperatively and respectfully. The first day seemed to go well, the groups worked efficiently, members were friendly with each other, they utilized their roles. So you thought, “hey, this isn’t so bad!”. The second day…well, not so much. Don’t lose hope, your careful planning did not go to waste. Group dynamics, as we know, are complicated. Here is some advice on what you can do to help your students work more effectively together when things don’t go according to plan. 

Backtrack

Group Behaviors 

As part of your contract creation process, you can have your students reflect on constructive and destructive group behaviors. You can call them “not-so-constructive,” or similar, as to not demoralize your students. This short reflection can make students more self-aware of their group behaviors, accountable for them, and prevent conflict.

Facilitation: Provide groups with the following list. Give them time to read and reflect, then have them choose and write down one of each type that they can relate to and share with their group. Reassure them that people do both and ask them to reflect honestly about how they have worked in groups in the past or share a story about when you worked in a group. 

Constructive Behaviors

  • Cooperating – Is interested in the views and perspectives of other group members and is willing to adapt for the good of the group.
  • Clarifying – Makes issues clear for the group by listening, summarizing and focusing discussions.
  • Inspiring – Enlivens the group, encourages participation and progress.
  • Harmonizing – Encourages group cohesion and collaboration.
  • Risk taking – Is willing to risk possible personal loss or embarrassment for the group or project success.
  • Process Checking – Questions the group on process issues such as agenda, time frames, discussions topics, decision methods, use of information, etc.

 Not-So-Constructive Behaviors 

  • Dominating – Takes much of meeting time expressing self-views and opinions. Tries to take control by use of power, time, etc.
  • Rushing – Encourages the group to move on before the task is complete. Gets “tired” of listening to others and working as a group.
  • Withdrawing – Removes self from discussions or decision-making. Refuses to participate.
  • Discounting – Disregards or minimizes group or individual ideas or suggestions. Severe discounting behavior includes insults, which are often in the form of jokes.
  • Digressing – Rambles, tells stories, and takes the group away from its primary purpose.
  • Blocking – Impedes group progress by obstructing all ideas and suggestions. “That will never work because…”

Adapted from Brunt (1993). Facilitation Skills for Quality Improvement. Quality Enhancement Strategies. 1008 Fish Hatchery Road. Madison WI 53715

Group Roles

You may consider switching up the group roles. Perhaps a student chose their role in an uninformed manner, and it is not aligned with their strengths. A more suitable role can help students be motivated to work with their group and feel they can contribute meaningfully. If you will utilize groups in each class for the entire semester, consider changing them completely once or twice, especially if you are receiving complaints or notice groups aren’t working well. Sometimes, you may have to switch members before you planned, in order to manage conflict. 

Incorporate peer-instruction

Use the think-pair-share strategy within groups to spark cooperative learning and discussion. Groups can then be combined to expand on this and build up to a whole class discussion.

Round 1: Think Individually; Round 2: Pair Up; Round 3: Share with the class

https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/setting-up-and-facilitating-group-work-using-cooperative-learning-groups-effectively/

Assess & Reflect 

As part of your assessment plan for the group work and student contributions, consider the following:

Is each member contributing?

Did your groups use their roles during the second class? Discord can form in groups when work is not evenly divided. Since students were motivated for the new project the first day, they may have all contributed equally. Then, on the second day their typical group behaviors were more apparent. In addition to the suggestion above about group behaviors, perhaps you can incorporate a way to make them use their roles more explicitly, and/or have them submit an individual work component. This will hold each person accountable and may alleviate some of the tension. 

Will your students tell you there are problems?

It may seem a group is working well together, but that may not be the case. Students can be struggling with their group and not inform you. Students are often hesitant to provide honest feedback, even if explicitly asked for it because they think it may affect their grade, alter your perception of them, or that somehow their group members will find out what they said. If you are using a survey or another tool to collect feedback from students to their group, be sure to make it clear that you are truly asking for their honest feedback because you want them to work well together and succeed. 

Provide additional resources to help your students

You students may need time management tips, more explicit instructions, follow-up information, or direct help managing group conflict, despite your best efforts. Are there other resources you can give them to help? Consider sharing the following guide with your students when starting the group work or project:

References: 

Guide: Group work: Using cooperative learning groups effectively by Cynthia J. Brame and Rachel Biel https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/setting-up-and-facilitating-group-work-using-cooperative-learning-groups-effectively/

Group Projects: A Conflict Resolution Guide for Students by Heidi Burgess, Co-Director, university of Colorado Conflict Research Consortium https://www.beyondintractability.org/educationtraining/group-projects

Article: How to Survive Virtual Groupwork https://www.elearners.com/education-resources/online-learning/how-to-survive-virtual-group-work/

Essay: Facilitating Group Discussions: Understanding Group Development and Dynamics

Kathy Takayama, Brown University

https://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/V21-N1-Takayama.pdf

 

Group Work

Jennifer Jaiswal  Jennifer Jaiswal, Instructional Designer & Sr Instructional Technologist 

Am I the only one who has heard the collective groan when the class group work project is announced? Am I the only one who has had a terrible group work project, where I’ve been stuck writing the report or presentation on my own? Most students and faculty have had poor group work experiences. What are the reasons for having them in our courses?

Team work, holding hands
Image by Tumisu from Pixabay

As we prepare our students for the workforce, the National Association of Colleges and Employers have teamwork/collaboration as one of the top career competencies that employers are looking for college graduates to have. Working as a team also allows students to develop their competencies in: professionalism/work ethic, oral/written communications, leadership and more. These career competencies can all be developed through group work projects (NACE, 2019).

The group work assignments that we complete in our classes serve as a testing ground for how we should participate in groups in our professional lives after graduation. Assigning a group project with no guidelines or restrictions is not realistic and sets up groups for challenges. But what makes a good group project? 

Guidelines:

Don’t assign a group project without a team plan. Planning ahead can help to make sure that everyone in the group has an idea of what the group will be completing and what their own individual responsibilities are. Using a Group Contract can help students think through the key features of a functioning team and what they each will be responsible for in the project. 

Contracts should include:

  • Names and contact information: This helps to set up accountability and the ability to get in contact with each other. 
  • Team roles and responsibilities: Each team member should take responsibility for part of the project and list its responsibilities in the contract. Team members may take on multiple roles as part of their project, but listing out what their responsibilities are helps to balance the workload upfront and create the timeline. Some examples are: 
    • Leader – sets the agenda, sends reminders, and keeps team members accountable.
    • Researcher – gathers raw material for the group and cites sources; can be more than one in a team
    • Writer/Producer – connects the research together to tell the story
    • Editor – reviews the final draft for errors, references, and makes sure that it is ready to be sent to instructor or ready for presentation 
    • More roles and their descriptions can be found on the CSU: San Marcos page
  • Best Dates and Times to Meet:
    • Asking this at the beginning helps to avoid the conflict later. 
    • This helps to set up accountability and a schedule for touching base over the course of the project. 
    • You can also arrange your groups based on what times they are most available to help the group have a natural meeting time.
  • Timeline:
    • What are the tasks that need to be completed by each member of the group?
    • What is a reasonable time by which that task should be completed?
    • The Writer/Producer should work with the Researchers to set a deadline that gives them time to produce the project
    • The Editor should set the final timeline to make sure they have enough time to review and complete the project before the deadline.
  • Signatures:
    • All members should sign to show they agree with the written plan and turn a copy into the faculty member.

Getting Started:

If you are looking for a sample to get started see our Group Contract Template. This has suggestions for information that can go into your contract. You can make a copy and edit it to best meet your needs.

The description of your assignment should be clear and understandable with the knowledge that your students will have of the course and its content. It should be broken down into manageable tasks that students will be able to complete in the time allotted. Offering examples of previous projects that did well can also help students make sure they are not planning the scope of the project to be too big.

Creating a model where the group project can be evaluated on an individual basis can also help the group to function better. This shows that you are interested in all members completing tasks and working on the project together, and can help to prevent group members from becoming estranged, not participating or letting the other members carry all the weight of the project. For example, you can have a joint presentation but also have a reflection paper where students cover what they learned in the process of the project that can be evaluated for an individual grade. For more information and methods on assessing groups please see this article by the Eberly Center from Carnegie Mellon

Reflection 

Last but not least, ask your students to reflect on their process, the project, their participation, and other member’s participation. This gives the students the opportunity to alert you to any challenges in the group and if members were not participating equally. You can have reflections at multiple points throughout the project, not just at the end. Some sample questions you can ask are:

  • How is the team working as a whole? Are there challenges? What are they? How are they being resolved?
  • What have you been working on since the beginning of the project?
  • How have your peers been participating in the project?
  • What do you think of your own contributions to the project?

Thinking out the process of the group project and what the expectations are can help to make a better experience as students learn how to design and plan a project while learning how to manage and work with a team. For help with your group project please contact CELT.

 

Reference

NACE Staff. (2019, March 29). The four career competencies employers value most. National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE). https://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/the-four-career-competencies-employers-value-most/

Engagement in the Educational Interface

Kristin Hall  Kristin Hall, Instructional Designer

You often may hear the term engagement in an educational setting, but what do we mean by engagement? According to a popular framework, Fredricks et al, (2004) describes engagement as a multifaceted, mega construct including behavioral, emotional and cognitive components. It is considered to be malleable and responsive to the environment which means instructors can influence a student’s engagement in their course. 

Overall, students who are engaged are more likely to be successful in their courses (Kahu, 2018) as there is research to support that engagement has a positive relationship with academic achievement (Fredricks et al., 2004, Kahu & Nelson, 2018). A recent framework developed by Kahu and Nelson (2018) seeks to expand upon the concept of engagement and describe the complex relationship between institutional factors and students’ backgrounds that influence students’ engagement. There are many factors involved including the University culture, policies, teaching as well as student motivation, skills, background and support. (See Kahu & Nelson (2018) for a more in depth review). 

Kahu and Nelson (2018) found through their research four factors that strongly influence student engagement including self-efficacy, emotions, belonging and well-being. While these factors are not a definitive list, they are critical factors to consider. Here are some strategies you can use in your courses to help students increase their engagement based on these four factors.

  • Self-efficacy: This is the student’s belief in their abilities. If a student believes they can be successful, they are more likely to be motivated, persistent, and use appropriate self-regulation skills. To build students’ self-efficacy, instructors can: 
    • build achievable assignments and assessments early on in their course to help build confidence 
    • break down large assignments into smaller parts to make them more manageable
    • provide a well-organized syllabus and course with clear expectations
  • Emotions: Learning is an emotional experience and recent research is paying more attention to academic emotions. Students can be experiencing a wide variety of emotions from enthusiasm and enjoyment to frustration, anxiety, and boredom. 
    • To build interest and enthusiasm instructors can: 
      • relate the subject matter to real-world experiences
      • incorporate varied and frequent assessments and activities
      • allow the opportunity for choice when appropriate (but not too much choice!) 
      • incorporate an appropriate level of challenge
    • To mitigate frustration, anxiety, and boredom instructors can: 
      • present clear and direct instructions for assignments and assessments
      • avoid questions that are designed to intentionally “trick” students
      • break down long videos into 8-10 minute segments
      • provide a well organized syllabus and course with clear expectations
  • Belonging: Belonging is described as how connected a student feels to their educational environment or the degree of fit they perceive (Kahu & Nelson, 2018). To increase a sense of belonging, instructors can:
    • practice inclusive teaching by incorporating diverse perspectives, creating an inclusive classroom climate, and examining your own implicit biases
    • use welcoming language within your syllabus and classroom
    • show you care about each students’ success
    • incorporate Universal Design principles in your courses
  • Well-being: Well-being is influenced by a students’ stress level. Stress can come from both school and personal factors and all can affect engagement. High stress levels are linked to a decrease in motivation and lower levels of enjoyment (Kahu & Nelson, 2018). All of the strategies listed above can mitigate stress levels and increase a student’s sense of well-being and in the end, can increase a student’s engagement. In addition, instructors are encouraged to:
  • include resources to support services on campus including Counseling and Psychological Services, Dean of Students, Academic Advising and Academic Tutoring

If you are interested in learning more about incorporating any of these strategies into your courses, feel free to email CELT. 

References:

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Kahu, E., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

 

Teaching Tuesdays

The Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) has always been dedicated to the belief that excellent teaching in all its forms is vital to student success. Recently, to better align with our mission, we have been moved to the Office of the Provost under Elizabeth Newman, PhD, Vice Provost for Curriculum and Undergraduate Education. 

Teaching Tuesdays This semester, we are excited to begin a new initiative: Teaching Tuesdays. During these sessions, CELT experts will discuss evidence-based practical strategies and reflective questions aligned with the research expertise of staff in our department. Please join us at 11:15am in the Faculty Commons (Melville Library E1332) for any of the following topics:

  • Using Critical Self-Reflection to Catalyze Inclusive Pedagogy with Carol Hernandez on October 5th 
    • The pandemic has made clear that social identities, both those of our students as well as our own, shape not only how we are experiencing the fallout of the crisis, but also how we experience teaching and learning. Our session will address how reflecting on the intersection of our identities is a crucial catalyst to improving an educator’s inclusive teaching practice.
  • Grading for Teaching Assistants (TAs): Reducing Bias and Time-Saving Tips with Kimberly Bell, PhD on October 19th 
    • Grading and assessment are an integral part of any teaching experience. In addition to the technical details of entering and submitting grades, time management and biases also play an important role in grading and assessment, and these are often more challenging to overcome. Join this workshop to hear more about time saving tips and strategies for reducing bias in your grading and assessment.
  • Supporting Students’ Self-Regulation Skills in Your Course with Kristin Hall on October 26th 
    • In this workshop, we will go over the importance of self-regulation skills and how they are linked to academic achievement and academic success.  We will also discuss how to model and help students develop these skills in your course. 
  • Designing Courses for all Students with Jennifer Jaiswal on November 2nd
    • Not all students learn in the same way. Creating courses that allow for diversity in how we interact with the content helps students to find different ways to engage and to connect with the course material. In this course we will discuss Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and redesign a course activity to be more inclusive.
  • National Distance Learning Week: Regular and Substantive Interaction: Reflections Based on the Updated Distance Education and Innovation Federal Regulations with Rose Tirotta, EdD on November 9th 
    • In July of 2021, the US Department of Education updated the Distance Education and Innovation Federal Regulations to align with updated pedagogical research and technological capabilities. This session will review these changes in parallel with evidence-based practices to reflect on future and current course development and organization. 
  • Ideation as a Teaching Strategy with Jennifer Jaiswal on November 16th 
    • How can you help your students craft new ideas in their area of study, create new products, or design new models for problem solving? Ideation is the process of creating many new ideas using generative thinking strategies. Ideation takes advantage of creativity to create new ways of thinking about problems and creating solutions. In this session we will cover generative thinking,  project models that can be applied and take on a design challenge.
  • Designing a Logic Model for Your Grant Evaluation with Catherine Scott on November 23rd 
    • Logic models are often required when submitting grant proposals. So what are they? Why do you need one? And how can you create your own? Join this workshop to have these questions answered and leave with a template to help you create your own.
  • Jump Start Engagement with Active Learning with Kimberly Bell, PhD and Rose Tirotta, EdD on November 30th 
    • Active learning can improve student outcomes and keep students engaged during and in-between your class meetings. Getting started incorporating active learning, implementing it, and assessing its effectiveness can seem challenging. Join this workshop to hear more about why active learning works and strategies you can implement and assess easily in your courses right away.

Please register prior to the session using the links above and email us if you have any questions.

Syllabus updates!

Jennifer Jaiswal  Jennifer Jaiswal, Instructional Designer & Sr Instructional Technologist 

Over this past semester, we have made multiple updates to CELT’s online syllabus template and the supporting documentation. This new version will speed you through the process of creating a comprehensive syllabus that supports student success in multiple ways!

Accessibility 

Earlier this year we adapted our syllabus template to make it accessible for all audiences. Navigating a syllabus with a screen reader technology is very different compared to navigating a syllabus by sight. Screen readers will read through all of the text, both visible and hidden in a document. Making sure that you clearly label information, use headers, have a table of contents and provide alternative text is key to creating a syllabus that all learners can read.

  • Headers – Headers or styles are used in Microsoft word documents to help create a hierarchy of information and to structure documents. Important information should be in Header 1, secondary information in Header 2, tertiary information in Header 3 and so on. This information can be used to help generate your table of contents
  • Table of Contents – Having a table of contents may seem like overkill in a syllabus but it helps students quickly and easily find the information that they are looking for. Your headers can easily generate and update your table of contents as you make changes. When navigating with a screen reader, the table of contents will be one of the first things that is read out loud to the student. This helps them understand the format of the document and where to start looking for information. It also creates a series of links that the students can use to jump to sections and navigate quickly through the document using keystrokes.
  • Alternative Text – Alternative text or alt text is a description of an item that cannot be read easily or at all by a screen reader. The most common example is an image. Images in your syllabus should all have alt text descriptions to describe the image. Alt text descriptions can be short, but sometimes you may need long descriptions to tell detailed information. In the image below the alt text could be “Stony Brook University and crest.” This tells the reader what is in the image with words.

SBU crest and name

  • Tables – Table should also have alt text descriptions and their header rows marked in the table settings. This provides additional information to the screen reader to let the person know how complicated the table is, what information is in the table, and what order the information appears in. Do not merge cells in your table as this can make it confusing for the person reading it since they would not be sure which column heading applies to the merged cell. 

For information on the changes made to our syllabus template and how to update the template, please see the video below.

 

For an example of how a screen reader navigates our syllabus template please see this video.

Inclusivity

When writing your syllabus, keep in mind Universal Design for Learning. Are you addressing all students in your syllabus? Is there flexibility for students? Is the content multimodal? Can students see the connections between learning objectives and what they are being asked to do? Some other pieces to think about are:

  • What language are you using? Try to avoid negative words and instead use your syllabus to show students how to succeed in your class. 
  • Be approachable! Give students multiple ways and opportunities to connect with you if they need assistance.
  • But give boundaries! Tell students upfront what you expect from them and what they should expect from you. Will it take you 24 hours to respond to an urgent email? Will you be available over the weekend? Lay the ground rules early. 

For more information, visit our resources on inclusive teaching

Other Updates

Best of all, we now have an orientation video designed to introduce you to the template in just 15 minutes. Don’t miss it–it explains everything that should be considered when creating an online version of your course. There’s also a “guiding comments” pdf file you can print to have by your side as you write your syllabus.

Reflections on Remote Teaching

multiple lightbulbs
Image by chenspec from Pixabay

In March 2020, the pandemic pushed all faculty and students to a remote teaching reality. CELT is hosting two online conversations where faculty members can get together to talk about what worked well, what they might want to incorporate into their teaching practice moving forward, and what they wish they had known back then.

When you register, you will have the option to respond to three reflective prompts. Using those responses, we will take a deeper dive into what actions faculty can take as they prepare to teach in the fall.

Your responses will remain confidential and will only be shared in aggregate as part of our study on the overall effectiveness of CELT. Your participation in this study is voluntary and you may continue to participate in CELT services even if you withdraw from the study of its effectiveness.

Register in advance to attend either of the CELT Reflections on Remote Teaching. Even if you cannot attend, register so that you can receive the recording and resources.

 

Opportunity to Participate in Teaching Related Research

Researchers from Ball State University are conducting teaching related research that explores faculty views and practices about sharing teaching materials. This study is looking for participants from a cross-disciplinary group of faculty and welcomes your participation. 

If you have taught at least one college-level class as the primary instructor, you are eligible to participate in this study. Participation involves completing a survey that will take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete. Participants are eligible to receive one of 10 Tango gift cards valued at $10 each. 

The study (Materials Dissemination) has been approved by the Ball State University Institutional Review Board (IRBNet ID 1649675-1). 

The link for the study is:

https://bsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_6xjfWnNCHZWvhZQ

If you have any questions about this study, please contact Kelsey Thiem (kthiem@bsu.edu, 765-285-8048) or Mary Kite (mkite@bsu.edu, 765-285-8197). For your rights as a research participant, you may contact the Office of Research Integrity, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, (765) 285-5052, orihelp@bsu.edu.